Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Delegate Assembly motion 26 - about bl**dy time

Discussion in 'General Issues and Discussion Forum' started by blinda, Feb 24, 2017.

  1. blinda

    blinda MVP


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Interesting Motion 26 from Lanarkshire branch for the Delegate Assembly in this months Pod Now:

    "Believes that it has become apparent that the Health Care Professions Council (HCPC) has not ensured that Society members have protection of titles and that this organisation has misled the profession and the public since its inception; Asks that the Society addresses this issue of being disingenuous with the truth on protection of the titles "Chiropodist" and "Podiatrist" with the HCPC; Further asks that the Society seeks legal advice against both the HCPC and the lawyers who represented the Society during initial consultation with the HCPC for the misinterpretation of our protection of title".

    Absolutely. The HCPC still (falsely) claim that the titles are protected. This is a direct contradiction to the clarification by a High Court Judge on the Health Professions Order legislation. Her written verdict stated, in part; “It should be noted at this point that the correct terminology is “designated title” rather than “protected title” "(quotation marks hers, not mine). This outed deception has gone on long enough.
     
Loading...

Share This Page