Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Dr visits leave patients forgetful

Discussion in 'Practice Management' started by NewsBot, Jun 25, 2008.

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1

    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    ScienceDaily are reporting:
    Hurried Doctor Visits May Leave Patients Feeling Forgetful
    Full story
     
  2. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1
    Recall-Promoting Physician Behaviors in Primary Care
    Jordan Silberman, Aleksey Tentler, Rajeev Ramgopal and Ronald M. Epstein
    Journal Journal of General Internal Medicine
     
  3. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    I recall a similar project from ~15 yrs ago. It was done in New York as a gynaecologist's office. Each consultation was audio recorded (patient did not know). As the patient left the receptionist gave each patient a white rose. Waiting down the street in each direction were the researchers looking for people with white roses. They waited down the road to give time for what happened during the consult to sink in. They then asked the patient about the advice given and what they were told about there problem. They then compared that to the audio of what they were actually told.

    I do not recall the exact results, but they were horrific. The patients had either forgot or got wrong >50% of what they were told!
     
  4. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    Also, this kind of research does raise ethical issues:
    Did the physician consent to this? I hope they did! - even if it was a blanket consent and they did not know which would be the 'standardised" patient. If consent was not obtained, then that is problematic ethically (I have not read the full paper); if they did give consent, then the Dr's behaviour would have been altered as they knew about the project (informed consent) --> invalidates research.
    There would have been issues here about the ethics of deception and not knowing about the recording. I assume that they would have had to give consent after for the researchers to listen to the tape. The problem is that many ethics committees today (maybe not when this research would have been done) may not permit it today.....BUT, if the patient knew they were being recorded for research purposes (informed consent), then this would affect their recall and behaviours --> invalidates research.
     
Loading...

Share This Page