Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Talus Control Foot Orthotics

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by NewsBot, Mar 9, 2017.

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1

    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    The Effects of Talus Control Foot Orthoses in Children with Flexible Flatfoot.
    So Young Ahn, MD, MS, Soo Kyung Bok, MD, PhD, Bong Ok Kim, MD, PhD, In Sik Park, MS, BS(Pod, CPed)
    Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association: January 2017, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 46-53.
     
  2. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    FFS! JAPMA is on fire this month with letting stuff through the editorial and peer review process. Pretty every paper published in current volume should NOT have passed the peer review and editorial process. This has become an ongoing systemic problem at JAPMA.
    The above one used a within groups analysis rather than a between groups (that is something of a speciality at JAPMA) and did multiple inappropriate comparisons.
     
  3. Dieter Fellner

    Dieter Fellner Well-Known Member

    Craig: can you please expand to know what you mean by this? Taking a cursory look, the study compares outcome between RFO and TCFO.
     
  4. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    They used the wrong analysis. JAPMA's peer review and editorial process let it through AGAIN!
    This is what they did wrong: http://www.itsafootcaptain.com/with...ta-and-the-way-too-many-studies-get-it-wrong/

    They also did multiple comparisons. The more comparisons that you do, the more likely you will find a result by chance, so you need to adjust the acceptable p value lower than 0.05. They did not do that. Its called a Bonferroni adjustment or correction. Again, the peer review and editorial process should have picked up on that.

    (Pretty much every study in the latest JAPMA should not have been published for flaws in the analysis - JAPMA has become that hopeless)
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  5. Dieter Fellner

    Dieter Fellner Well-Known Member

    Master of analysis ... thank you. I have a 'hunch' that JAPMA 'peer reviewers' are ill-trained in research statistical analysis and therefor ill-equipped to make such an analysis. I am assuming you reported the mistake to the Editor?
     
  6. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    No. I have tried in the past. I have given up on that. They do not listen and do not get it.
    I have even resorted to things like this: http://www.itsafootcaptain.com/japma-lets-us-down-again-shock-wave-for-mortons-neuroma/ <-- have a read about this and what I said about ethics.
     
  7. Dieter Fellner

    Dieter Fellner Well-Known Member

    Spreading the word on Facebook .... social media rules the world!
     
Loading...

Share This Page