Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Who's to blame for obesity? Policymakers, the food industry, or individuals?

Discussion in 'General Issues and Discussion Forum' started by NewsBot, Jan 23, 2014.

Tags:
  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1

    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Press Release:
    Who's to blame for obesity? Policymakers, the food industry, or individuals?
     
  2. Admin2

    Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

  3. wdd

    wdd Well-Known Member

    Who's to blame for obesity?

    That's a good start. Don't attempt to look at the cause in all of its complexity or how the causative factors interrelate. No identify someone, or something to point the finger at. Good judaeochristian stuff.

    Policymakers, the food industry, or individuals?

    Is that a comprehensive list and if not why not?

    Bill
     
  4. efuller

    efuller MVP

    So, they asked a bunch of people, of whom there is probably only a small percentage who are actually informed, what they think is the cause. This data would only be useful for determining what people think is true, not what is actually true. It seems media are presenting a lot of "studies" like this.
     
  5. wdd

    wdd Well-Known Member

    A simple (possibly simple-minded) but absolutely effective way to cure obesity would be to ban the motor car.

    There you go that's pointing the finger in a direction that the research didn't apparently think of but don't hold your breath.
     
  6. wdd

    wdd Well-Known Member

    So, they asked a bunch of people, of whom there is probably only a small percentage who are actually informed, what they think is the cause. This data would only be useful for determining what people think is true, not what is actually true. It seems media are presenting a lot of "studies" like this.

    I think that the word "informed" is central to the whole issue. The nature of the "information" is almost uniformly second rate and seems more like disinformation than information, designed to confuse rather than to clarify. The information is not only often contradictory but seems to keep the range of the discussion very narrow, consistently covering the same limited themes and presenting them as comprehensive coverage.

    Whatever the forces are working against a solution to this problem, when they result in a poll in which the monkeys smack their own behinds, its a sure sign that they are winning.

    Bill

    PS

    A man bought a monkey. The monkey peed on the floor. The man rubbed the monkeys nose in it, smacked his behind and threw him out of the window.

    The next day the monkey peed on the floor. The man rubbed his face in it, smacked his behind and threw him out of the window.

    Eventually the monkey peed on the floor, smacked his own behind and jumped out of the window.
     
  7. HansMassage

    HansMassage Active Member

    Farmers that blamed the policy makers are probably the ones that did not get the money.
    Recipients of the food aid that blamed policy makers probably cold only get subsidised food that is high in calories and low in nutrients. The saying is fallow the money.
    It seems to be the same formula as why is one percent getting richer and 99% getting poorer.
     
Loading...

Share This Page