Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Validity of measuring leg length with a tape measure compared to a computed tomography scan

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by NewsBot, Jan 10, 2013.

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1

    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Validity of measuring leg length with a tape measure compared to a computed tomography scan
    Kurt Neelly, Harvey W. Wallmann, and Chad J. Backus
    Physiotherapy Theory and Practice (online first)
     
  2. Admin2

    Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

  3. Griff

    Griff Moderator

    A genuine surprise just how high all those correlation coefficients are - particularly the interrater measures (higher than the intrarater ?!?)

    Anyone have a copy of the full text?
     
  4. drsha

    drsha Banned

    I agree but in addition, even a 1/8" LLD can have clinical implications when there is additional biomechanical comorbidities.

    Furthermore, supine TMM to the medial malleolus does not allow for any difference that exists in the patient from the medial malleolus down (intra-pedal).
    and finally
    This is an open chain measurement which has little applicability to the closed chain presentation of the patient and the actual deforming forces that exist in closed chain (i.e. lacks cliical correlation).

    For me, that makes this paper of little clinical import and further proves that if supine TMM or CT Scans are the standard, they need replacement.

    Until then, LLD, especially in small amounts (>1/2") remains without valid, applicable and acceptable EBM including ths addition.
    Dennis
     
  5. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1
    Validity of clinical methods in the detection of leg-length discrepancies.
    Gomez-Aguilar E et al
    Hip Int. 2020 Mar 3
     
Loading...

Share This Page