Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Complimentary Therapy Clinics Vs HPC

Discussion in 'United Kingdom' started by DTT, Aug 3, 2005.

  1. DTT

    DTT Well-Known Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Hi All

    It has occurred to me that a lot of the above clinics are springing up advertising a range of therapies some including "Chiropody"

    As the title is now protected will:-

    The same rules apply to them when advertising in yellow pages, registration number of the practitioner etc before YP will accept the advert ??

    If the same rules do not apply then an FHP is brought in to work in the premises, who would be liable for prosecution the FHP or the owner of the clinic ?

    If they do not have a Chiropodist working there and are still advertising "Chiropody" are they still in breach of the act ??

    Any idea's??

    Cheers

    Derek
     
  2. R.E.G

    R.E.G Active Member

    complimentary therapy clinics

    Probably,

    As mentioned on another forum it will be up to the HPC or trading standards to pursue these issues.

    The next year will tell us if the powers are real.

    It's IMO a great shame that this situation has arisen, it could be blamed on the process, as some have said it was a very intimidating experience, but again some training organisations continued despite knowing there graduates could never be chiropodists. Hence FHP's.

    What a mess.
     
  3. joseph Paterson

    joseph Paterson Active Member

    On the notice board of a local council warden run sheltered home read the following notice: "Chiropody Clinic" with no names advertised, please inform the warden if you would like an appointment.

    Is this a way around the HPC? Can the HPC take any action over this kind of advertising? or is it another toothless quango that we all pay for (reluctant or not).

    If local council are not aware of the HPC and it's agenda, then what chance is there of the public knowning?
     
  4. George Brandy

    George Brandy Active Member

    It was interesting to note in the just published Yellow Pages for my locality the link was not to Foot Health but to Complimentary therapies which I thought kind of quirky.

    So here we are complimented to healing crystals, ear candles (why does Father Ted always spring to mind at this point!!) and goodness knows what else to get rid of hair wherever it springs once the land mark of 40 has passed.

    I don't know but a link to Foot Health may have been more preferable.

    GB
     
Loading...

Share This Page