Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Dramatically increased musculoskeletal ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009, especially by podia

Discussion in 'USA' started by NewsBot, Jun 8, 2012.

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1

    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Dramatically increased musculoskeletal ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009, especially by podiatrists in private offices.
    Sharpe RE, Nazarian LN, Parker L, Rao VM, Levin DC.
    J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Feb;9(2):141-6.
     
  2. Mart

    Mart Well-Known Member

    I think that the podiatric community needs to urgently develop some standards, proper education and QA for sonography so that any concerns regarding financial abuse, the well documented tendency to use clinical tools simply because there is financial gain to or poor clincial reasoning are addressed. Historically US seems to have suffered its fair share of being undermined by these issues.

    Conversly I think there are good arguments not to regard US in same light as other imaging modalities. We would unlikely criticise clinicians for using a newly developed validated and useful technique as part of a physical exam. I think that US is often a useful extension of the PE. It boils down to cost benefit ratio and interpretation is an important component for this.

    Cheers

    Martin

    Foot and Ankle Clinic
    1365 Grant Ave.
    Winnipeg Manitoba R3M 1Z8
    phone [204] 837 FOOT (3668)
    fax [204] 774 9918
    www.winnipegfootclinic.com
     
  3. reckles

    reckles Member

    No surprise here- American DPM's have been all over this technology in the past decade, assisted by-"You can make an extra $3K a month by doing 5 scans a week in your office." offers from US suppliers- often doing "baseline" ultrasounds. Over utilization, anyone?
    No surprise when Medicare pulls the plug. When do we learn?
     
Loading...

Share This Page