DON'T USE SUPPORTS!!!

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.

Like Mark i have also sinned in a past life. Anyone else get this one?

In my inbox this AM from Prof Rothbart.

I have questions.

1. Why, in the 6 months, did the vectometer and the laptop stay in the exact same position.

2. Why are the shadows exactly the same for both sets of feet.

3. How does this fit with published research such as

And the Payne / Zammit study which show that orthotics have either no effect or a benificial effect on muscle strength.

Regards
Robert

 

To be fair i've had similar problems with one of my patients

before supportive orthotics





And one year after




The evidence is mounting. Anyone else had these problems?

Regards
Robert

 

And just take a look at the results of "arch supports" on this guy.... Sheesh!


Before:




6 months post:

 

I am not on his email list, so did not get it. He really is turning into a serial spammer. I just do not understand why anyone would go out of their way to open themselves to being ridiculed.

 

Oh Robert, Oh Robert, Oh Robert (and you too Sam) ....you can NOT keep running scams like this. You know as well as I do that it was not really the orthotic did this .... it was the dodgy light settings on your cameras you used for the follow up photos! ... we all know that trick. And, besides, it also probably just they way they are holding their mouths (we learnt that trick from Marks's thread)

 

Thats a deeply suspicious mind you have there Craig. I have heard that the camera adds 10 years. Or in sams picture knocks of 70 lbs.

But what about this? This was his dog before




And 28 days later



Come now. You cannot dismiss the evidence of your own eyes!

 

igs:

Well… in some situations the abrupt compensations may even turn some psychotic…



LOL