Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Foot position during serial casting

Discussion in 'Pediatrics' started by Bug, Jun 18, 2009.

  1. Bug

    Bug Well-Known Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    I was part of an interesting physio/podiatry debate today and was hoping to understand more about this.

    We were chatting about metadductus casting and serial casting for neuromuscular interventions ie: spasticity of the gastrocs and what position should the rearfoot be held in.

    Of course the podiatry argument was - STJ neutral (or whatever that is), but based on the age group, perpendicular or slightly inverted. The physio argument was, STJ neutral when the foot is at 90 degrees to the leg, is everted, therefore the foot when casted should also be slightly everted.

    What also came up with a lack of evidence that putting shoes on the wrong feet for semi-rigid metadductus was actually inappropriate. The only reference in a number of texts/ journal articles to it causing excessive pronation was based on author opinion.

    I hope that makes sense, it went around and around but that is basically the end statement of the argument. Help?
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2009
Loading...

Share This Page