Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Forefoot Striker needs a raise?

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by RobinP, Jul 27, 2011.

  1. RobinP

    RobinP Well-Known Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Seeking the collective wisdom once again.

    In a patient that has a leg length discrepancy(LLD)in the magnitude of 10mm caused by trauma, raising the heel inside the shoe is fine for ambulation

    However, when the same person runs, they become a forefoot striker, never acheiving any heel contact.

    Lets say the symptoms are related to the LLD, is it necessary to raise the contact point ie the metatarsal heads in the same way that the heel is raised for ambulation?

    I'm sure this is a very stupid question and I am likely to be embarressed by the simplicity of the answer but I am struggling to justify why a raise wouldn't be appropriate. That then raises the question of how it is possible to raise the forefoot.......as easily as it is to raise the heel

    Appreciate any help

    Robin
     
  2. efuller

    efuller MVP

    A forefoot raise, either in the shoe or attached to the sole of the shoe is going to add a lot of bulk, weight, and stiffness to the thing attached to the foot. There's your problem. I don't see any way to predict what the patient will like. How much lift do they need to be comfortable running. Since there is a double float phase in running, do you need any lift at all? Do they choose to heel strike on the short side? I think you have to have them try several things to see what they like best.

    Eric
     
  3. Robin,

    You could raise the forefoot the same a heel - Yes, would you do it not really

    But the best thing to do would be to get the whole affected size raised the desired amount.

    Forefoot strikers will heel strike at certain points when running and will have heel contact even 100m sprinters contact the ground with their heels. If you raise the Forefoot only the chances of overuse in the triceps surea muscle group would increase.

    say you want 7 mm lift - get the whole sole increased by 7mm.
     
  4. RobinP

    RobinP Well-Known Member

    Quite. It's the accommodation of it inside a shoe that seems like it is not really feasible.

    I should make it clear at this point that I made an error in the description, the LLD is greater thatn 10mm(approximately 18-20 mm although clearly there could be significant error). 10mm was arrived at via a combination of trial and error comprimised by what could actually be accommodated inside the shoe. Pt less comfortable with less than 10mm.

    Agreed. Space in the footwear may allow 4-5mm raise to the forfoot and could taper to higher at the heel

    Footwear is flat pitched football boots and his gait footage showed very limited heel contact on the treadmill although obviously I didn't get him to run on the treadmill with football boots. Closest I could simulate was barefoot as patient had a strange choice of footwear with him! Clearly this may change things but from what I could gather, he has always been aware of coming up on to the toes early for running. He has one of those sprinters type of feet....you know the ones

    When the patient posed the question, i gave much the same answer and I also explained that the reduced limb contact time might make the LLD less significant but really, i couldn't give him a genuine answer.

    Looks like a bit of trial and error might be the answer. More time consuming though.

    I was hoping for...."you don't need to bother about it" so I could do nothing. ;)

    Cheers chaps

    robin
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2011
  5. Boots n all

    Boots n all Well-Known Member

    l dont like "heel raisers" any more then 6mm, shoes struggle to cup the heel plus we tend to see toes get crunched up in the end of the shoe and the shear action is increased, especially in athlete's.

    l would try a full length lift, if done correctly it wont add a great deal of weight, yes it will effect the flex, so it will need to be rolled off at the toe.
     
  6. RobinP

    RobinP Well-Known Member

    i suppose
    10 x 6 x 0 tapered raise might work?
     
  7. External raise to sole. It gets tricky with modern running shoes because of the various sole pods. A patient was treating who was a pretty good marathoner used an old school shoe nike waffle type with a straight through Eva midsole. In these it just a case of stripping off the outer sole, adding the lift and shaping, then replace outer sole. Have a chat with Phil wells I seem to recall him saying they could modify the shoes with individual sole pods.
     
  8. Athol Thomson

    Athol Thomson Active Member

  9. Boots n all

    Boots n all Well-Known Member

    That is exactly what l would do,10 at the heel to 6 at MPJ and then roll off to zero.

    Make up the actual build up before you attach, this gives you the best option for shaping and checking the measurement are what you are aiming for
     
  10. RobinP

    RobinP Well-Known Member

    Nice one Athol. I think this guy would have no problem wearing different boots - he's not vain.

    Depending on the construction of the boot and the removable inlay, I reckon i could probably get the contralateral side lowered by 5-7mm by grinding away the pitch that is built into the base layer of the boot. What do you think David? I've seen some of the pics of football boots you have adapted. Do you reckon this would be possible without affecting the structural integrity of the boots too much?

    Through inlay on the affected side of 4-5mm EVA, rockered to 0mm at the toe.

    Nett result 10mm raise through

    Brilliant. From at least one of these solutions, I think I should have a reasonable result, even if it means wearing 2 different boots.

    Thanks all
     
  11. Boots n all

    Boots n all Well-Known Member

    Without seeing the boot that is hard to answer, but with most of the boots we handle, l would not, 5-7mm removed would compromise the boot/support.

    We would see far too much sole missing and for some boots the entire sole:D.
     
  12. RobinP

    RobinP Well-Known Member

    Hmm, point taken David. Thanks
     
  13. Sally Smillie

    Sally Smillie Active Member

    I'd be looking at gastroc/triceps surae stretching. Uncompensated gait requires min 10 degrees ankle dorsiflexion for walking and 25 degrees for running. This explains why you're getting lack of heel strike in running, sounds like they have enough ROM for walking gait. Try PNF's for a bit of extra oomph for competition. And static stretching for long-term increased ROM. Try giving the 10mm raise too and see how they go.

    Whole lot easier than any full length raise....
     
  14. Sally, the numbers you give here: 10 degrees; 25 degrees are a bit old school.
     
  15. RobinP

    RobinP Well-Known Member

    Hi Sally,

    Equinous isn't a problem. Leg length is the problem. He isn't forefoot striking due to a lack of ankle complex ROM, it is his natural running style.

    With regards to running ankle joint ROM, lunge test is most predictive of injury, not ankle joint ROM

    Regards,

    Robin
     
  16. Sally Smillie

    Sally Smillie Active Member

    What is the current thinking on that then? More thinking along lines of uncompensated gait... Thanks
     
Loading...

Share This Page