Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Insurance paying for orthotics

Discussion in 'USA' started by kellenraid, Mar 11, 2010.

  1. kellenraid

    kellenraid Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    The predominant insurance companies in our rural do not pay sufficient amounts for orthotics to meet my laboratory fees for a pair of orthotics. I write long justification letters to them, but I get denials. They even have suggested that I use some prefabs or OTC's; this I will not do. Oh, I tried them, but they are shoddy and address not the biomechanical reasons for the painful pathology.
    My idea was to set up a corporation under which I would be an employee. Under the aegis of that corporation, I would perform the biomechanical exams and neurtral position casting. Then send the casts to my usual lab but under the name of the corporation. Well, you see where I am going with this.
    The patients whom I have queried this told me that they would pay out-of-pocket for the devices. The insurance companies have specifically stated that this type of thing was unacceptable i.e. if I accept their insurance, being contracted as I am, then I must accept their fee schedule. And this includes their rules.
    My concern is that my "scheme" might be good for the patients, but would I be in violation of the Stark Laws against self-referral?
    I cannot believe that I am the only pod out there facing this problem. If anyone has a solution better than this or a work around, I sure would like to know.
     
Loading...

Share This Page