Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Harvard study- Forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by Nick Sebastian Caravaggio, Apr 12, 2012.


  1. Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Hey everyone,

    I subscribe to Men's Health magazine which has alot of useful tips and information on physical activity and living the healthy lifestyle. However, today I just received the may issue where there is an article about running faster. One part stuck out at me and I wanted to know what your take is on the subject.

    "Be on the Ball"
    "If you land on your heel, you're almost certainly overstriding." says Alberto Salazar (who is a iconic american marathoner) "You're pounding your leg into the ground with each stride and increasing your risk of injury. When you land on the balls of your feet, you flow with your forward energy"
    A recent study of Harvard runner supports Salazar's theory; it found that forefoot strikers have fewer injuries than heel strikers.

    From Men's Health Magazine, May 2012 pg. 118.

    Has anyone every heard of this study? I would think the opposite is true, in that forefoot strikers would be more prone to injuries. From experience, i haven't come across very many forefoot strikers who are injury free.
     
  2. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
  3. Salazar was a great marathoner, but doesn't know what he is talking about in regards to injury frequency and footstrike pattern in runners. Currently, there are probably more runners being injured "trying" to be forefoot strikers upon the advice of ignorant coaches and know-nothing Chi, Pose or Alexander advocates, than there are injuries to those runners who remain rearfoot strikers.
     
  4. Craig Payne

    Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    Not normally wanting to go over old ground as it was well covered in the thread I linked above
    ...but that is a classic example of cherry picking and confirmation bias.

    That study was on 56 runners who were almost elite level. Why did they choose to pick that study and ignore:
     
Loading...

Share This Page