Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Quesation about biomechanics

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by csal0013, Aug 18, 2010.

  1. csal0013

    csal0013 Welcome New Poster


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    When one is conducting a biomechanical examination and finds out that the patient has an elevated first ray, and a plantarflexed 5th ray... should one implement a modification to the orthotics provided? Furthermore... if one has LLD and requires a Kirby skive on the shortest foot what do you suggest as a treatment? can both be applied? How would one know whether to use a varus bar or the normal bar?
     
  2. Griff

    Griff Moderator

    I am not exactly sure of your questions - why don't you either give us more information or put it up as a patient case study?

    Are you referring to a an observation of the forefoot being inverted in the frontal plane relative to the rearfoot?

    Are you asking if it is ok to incorporate a medial heel skive and a heel raise on a device?

    Not sure what you mean here at all. Terminology cab vary greatly between countries etc - you need to be more specific.
     
  3. I've used normal bars for years. Never had any problems besides hangovers.
     
  4. efuller

    efuller MVP

    Is the first ray elevated because the person was born that way or is it elevated because of high amounts of ground reaction force under the first ray for long periods of time. The answer would be different for one over the other. Although, I might change my answer if I new what hurt. I usually try to design my orthosis to relieve stress on a painful anatomical structure.

    Welcome to the arena,
    Eric
     
  5. Both can be applied, but remember the skive itself will act as a heel lift so you may want to lower the height of the heel lift slightly.
     
  6. Rich Blake

    Rich Blake Active Member

    I will discuss only part of the question. When examining a foot, and finding an elevated first and plantarflexed fifth, you must watch the patient walk. Are they functioning normally for this forefoot varus type foot and collapsing the medial arch and heel or not? The reason it could be "or not" is that other factors may be over-riding like a tibial varum with intoed gait, producing more of a supinating force around the subtalar joint. So, step back from your measurements and first watch the patient walk. What forces do you see? Is this a pronator that I need to support that forefoot varus and met primus elevatus, or is it a supinator, or a normal arched patient. Based on the study of gait, you will be able to answer your questions better. Rich Blake
     
Loading...

Share This Page