Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice

Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.

Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.

Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

PPG Wave analysis

Discussion in 'General Issues and Discussion Forum' started by MarkH, May 25, 2009.

< Painful lump, plantar surface of foot | Footbed shapes for enhanced footwear comfort >

MarkH Welcome New Poster

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
PPG waveform interpretation
I intend to acquire a PPG in the near future to enhance my vascular screenings.
The machine will be used for recording ABI & TBI. I have had a play with the Dopplex Assist (Huntleigh Healthcare) and at £3000 seems to be the best value, although if anyone has an alternative please let me know.
However the interpretation of the wave is something that is all but a distant memory and i will require access to publications/literature that explains what each peak and trough can reveal about the condition of an arteriole etc.
Can anyone give me details of how i acquire such information on line?

MarkH, May 25, 2009

#1