Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Cavo-varus orthotics

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by LuckyLisfranc, Oct 14, 2005.

  1. LuckyLisfranc

    LuckyLisfranc Well-Known Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Dear all,

    Just wondering what the current range of opinions is regarding orthotic management of significant flexible and rigid cavo-varus, which corrects the hindfoot to neutral with a Coleman block test (ie FF valgus/RF varus scenario).

    Is there any preference for Fettig/Denton/Feehrey modifications or similar.

    I seem to never quite get the amount of control I need to correct the hindfoot to neutral when bringing the "ground up" to meet the lateral column...

    :confused:
     
  2. LuckyLisfranc,
    A podiatrist by the name of Joshua Burns has just submitted his PhD on the best orthosis for the pes cavus foot type. I hope Josh will jump in and post, but what he presented at the recent Australasian Podiatry Conf suggested that the pt's faired best with a device that had:

    * Modified Root device
    * 20% medial arch fill (ie. maximum expansion)
    * Lateral heel post (with no taper/grind - almost a lateral heel flare). No posting on the medial side of heel.
    * 3mm Poron full length covering + Cashmere
    * 12mm heel cup height
    * 6mm lat heel expansion (mainly due to the thickness of the poron)
    * F/ft width - lateral border of foot to bisection of 1st MPJ
    * Length at distal edge was proximal to MPJ's

    I am not sure in which publication/s the research is to be submitted, but will post as soon as the details come to hand.

    Regards
    Phil Hartshorne
     
Loading...

Share This Page