Here's interesting, this is from the
http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/7/S1/A1 Meeting abstract
Foot biomechanics- emerging paradigms
Stephen F Albert
"Too many times theories of how the human foot functions and therefore how mechanically inducted foot problems are treated have been presented as if they were facts. The dogmatic adherence that sometimes ensues from such an approach has frequently stifled the evolution of foot mechanics. "
Which is interesting because the book review I wrote for Stephen F Albert to go on the back of this book:
http://faoj.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/lowerextremitybiomechanicsvol12.pdf
Says: "Too many times theories of podiatric biomechanics have been presented as if they were facts. The dogmatic adherence that someties ensues from such an approach has often stifled the evolution of podiatric biomechanics..."
Those that know the history here and the issues I had regarding my work being correctly represented within this book will surely see why I'm getting a little bit ****** off with Stephen Albert. :bang::mad: Copy, paste, quick thesaurus to change a couple of words and Bob's your Uncle. Is this plagiarism?
Click to expand...