Contested professional role boundaries in health care

NewsBot · Feb 12, 2015

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature
Olivia King, Susan A Nancarrow, Alan M Borthwick and Sandra Grace
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2015, 8:2 doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0061-1

Background
Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry.

Methods
A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure.

Results
The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates.

Conclusions
Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena.
Click to expand...

Admin2 · Feb 12, 2015

Related Threads:
Physiotherapists and podiatrists have differing perceptions of plantar fasciitis
'Relationships' with other professionals?
Chiropractors trying to control Massage Therapy
Interprofessional relationships between orthopaedic and podiatric surgeons in the UK
Interdisciplinary teams for multi-disciplinary education
Prosthetists & Orthotists vs Physical Therapists: Colleagues or Combatants?
Athletic Trainers vs Orthopaedic Section, APTA
Podiatrist Not Competent as Expert Against Orthopedic Surgeon

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

Newcastle Report contested

The factory supplies directly and provides cost-effective professional shoe OEM (ODM) and developmen

Continuing professional development opportunities for endorsed for scheduled medicines podiatrists

A conceptual framework for contemporary professional foot care practice

Health professional perspectives on clinical outcomes in UK orthotic practice

Foot shape analysis of professional American Football players

Medical Professionals’ Distance Running Advice and Treatment

Share This Page