Detection of foot and ankle implants by metal detectors

NewsBot · May 22, 2014

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Detection of In Vivo Foot and Ankle Implants by Walkthrough Metal Detectors
Jeremy Y. Chan, Sriniwasan B. Mani, Phillip N. Williams, Martin J. O’Malley, David S. Levine, Matthew M. Roberts, Scott J. Ellis
Foot & Ankle International May 20, 2014

Background: Heightened security concerns have made metal detectors a standard security measure in many locations. While prior studies have investigated the detection rates of various hip and knee implants, none have looked specifically at the detection of foot and ankle implants in an in vivo model. Our goals were to identify which commonly used foot and ankle implants would be detected by walkthrough metal detectors both in vivo and ex vivo.
Methods: Over a 7-month period, 153 weightbearing patients with foot and ankle hardware were recruited to walk through a standard airport metal detector at 3 different program settings (buildings, airports, and airports enhanced) with a base sensitivity of 165 (arbitrary units), as currently used by the Transportation Security Administration. The number of implants, location and type, as well as the presence of concomitant hardware outside of the foot and ankle were recorded. To determine the detection rate of common foot and ankle implants ex vivo, different hardware sets were walked through the detector at all 3 program settings.
Results: Seventeen patients were found to have detectable hardware at the buildings, airports, and airports enhanced settings. An additional 3 patients had hardware only detected at the airports enhanced setting. All 20 of these patients had concomitant metal implants outside of the foot and ankle from other orthopaedic procedures. All patients with foot and ankle implants alone passed through undetected. Seven hardware sets were detected ex vivo at the airports enhanced setting.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that patients with foot and ankle implants alone are unlikely to be detected by walkthrough metal detectors at standard airport settings. When additional hardware is present from orthopaedic procedures outside of the foot and ankle, metal detection rates were higher. We believe that these results are important for surgeons in order to educate patients on how they might be affected when walking through a metal detector such as while traveling.
Click to expand...

Admin2 · May 22, 2014

Unrelated Thread:
Podiatrist removing alien (UFO) implants

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

Ultrasound in the detection of foot and ankle fractures

Foot Small Muscle Atrophy Is Present Before the Detection of Clinical Neuropathy

Automatic Detection of Pronation Type of Runners Using Computer Vision

Detection of Pronation and Supination with Smart Socks

Detection of alcohol induced gait changes

Selecting a prospective test for early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy

Graphic Representation of Clinical Symptoms: A Tool for Improving Detection of Subtle Fractures on F

Share This Page