< Podiatry in Taiwan | Plantar padding and shear effects >
  1. admin Administrator Staff Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    I had not paid a great deal of attention to the Vioxx withdrawal until the last few days as my email in-box was filling up with spam emails seeking participants in class action law suits .... trust lawyers to stoop to such tactics :mad:

    Then a headline in this morning's papar caught my eye claiming that deaths from Vioxx could be in the 1000's :( - I fully understand that there is nothing like the truth to get in the way of a good story, so did some looking and found these very recent stories:

    Vioxx recall sparks health safety concern, doctors say
    Vioxx Pain Could Spread to Medco
    [size=-1]US drug agency accused on Vioxx [/size]
    [size=-1]After Vioxx, Other Drugs May Also Get Pulled [/size]
    Beyond Vioxx: 5 other drugs under FDA review
    Official Insists FDA Acted Appropriately With Vioxx
    [size=-1]FDA defends action on Vioxx and other drugs[/size]
    Drug alarm grows
    [size=-1]A drug company in for a little pain [/size]
    Another study on Vioxx emerges
    The Murky History of Merck's Vioxx
    [size=-1]NYT: Merck had earlier Vioxx info [/size]

    All these stories were free access at the time of posting. Some news organizations require paid access to archives after a period of time.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2004
  2. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Vioxx

    VIOXX .... WOW!!! - in a matter of minutes of posting the above message, all the Vioxx adverts appeared at the top of the page via Google!!!! - this Vioxx issue certainly must be a money spinner for the lawyers!!! :eek: .... don't figure :confused:
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2004
  3. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Vioxx spam

    Here is an eg of the spam flooding the in-box:
     
  4. admin Administrator Staff Member

    FDA is incapable of protecting US "against another Vioxx"

    News from British Medical Journal:
    FDA is incapable of protecting US "against another Vioxx"
    Full story
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2004
  5. admin Administrator Staff Member

  6. admin Administrator Staff Member

  7. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Vioxx Critic Defends Self

    Vioxx Critic Defends Self

    From Forbes.com:

    Full story
     
  8. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Merck Sued by New York Fund Over Vioxx

    Merck Sued by New York Fund Over Vioxx
    Full story from Yahoo! News
     
  9. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Celebrex Benefits From Vioxx Withdrawal

    Celebrex Benefits From Vioxx Withdrawal
    Full story from Yahoo! News
     
  10. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Celebrex now linked to increased risk for heart attacks.

    Celebrex Linked to Heart Attacks
    Full story
     
  11. pgcarter Well-Known Member

    Only Celebrex at high doses, I believe.
     
  12. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Clinical trial links Celebrex to heart risk
    Pfizer says there's not enough proof to pull drug off market
    December 18, 2004


    Full story
     
  13. admin Administrator Staff Member

  14. admin Administrator Staff Member

  15. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Celebrex

    Reuters are reporting:
    Full story from Medscape
     
  16. admin Administrator Staff Member

    Withdraw all COX-2-selective drugs

    A letter to the editor in the latest MJA argues that:

    Full letter
     
  17. admin Administrator Staff Member

  18. pgcarter Well-Known Member

    Glucosamine sulphate.....or Diclofenac sodium (Cox 1 and Cox 2 pathway) if it has to be trad NSAID...as long as it is tolerated. Constant use is a problem of course. When used to take the top off a spike of activity over shorter periods this is probably less of an issue.
    Regards Phill
     
  19. admin Administrator Staff Member

  20. admin Administrator Staff Member

    I will bump this old thread with this story for the Canadian Medical Journal

    Vioxx award good news for Canadian lawsuits

     
  21. Craig Payne Moderator

    Articles:
    8
    OK ... I going to stick my neck out here and get on my soapbox... :D

    I think juries in the US that award damages are thick (as we would say back in NZ "thick as pig****" --- for those that do not know, pig**** can be thick).

    Some basic epidemiology....
    Say, for eg, the risk for developing a fatal heart attack at age X is 1:50 000
    If you take Viozz that risk is increased to, say for example, to 3:50 000

    THATS NOT CAUSATION, THATS AN INCREASE IN RISK. :eek:

    Why are the juries so thick that they not grasp this basic epidemiology!!!!

    Look how wrong they got it with the silicone breat implants and connective tissue disease. A company went bankrupt over this, jobs were lost, bottom dwelling lawyers got rich .... but now we know (as the good science has been done) that there is NO increased risk for connective tissue disease from the use of silicon breast implants ---- those bottom dwelling lawyers that litigated these cases should be force to pay all the money back. :p
     
< Podiatry in Taiwan | Plantar padding and shear effects >
Loading...

Share This Page