Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Chronic ingrowth nail

Discussion in 'Foot Surgery' started by falconegian, Sep 5, 2010.

  1. falconegian

    falconegian Active Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    I would like to have suggestions on this case. My approach would be peartial onicectomy with phenol plus skin reduction through fish mouth incision.
    Suggestions?
    150.JPG

    151.JPG
     
  2. W J Liggins

    W J Liggins Well-Known Member

    Hi Falconegian

    Unless this is a pyogenic granuloma, given the position of the lesion, I would guess that it is the result of a frank sub-ungual exostosis or a hypertrophic distal phalangeal bone tuft. I would suggest that a D/P, oblique and true lateral X-ray would offer the differential diagnosis.

    Treatment would depend on the diagnosis, but I would suggest that phenol is superfluous.

    All the best

    Bill Liggins
     
  3. falconegian

    falconegian Active Member

    hi
    I have made x-ray and they are negative!
    why is phenol for you superflous? this lesion is 1 year inthis way. can only onicectomy and debridment solve the problem?
     
  4. W J Liggins

    W J Liggins Well-Known Member

    There have been cases reported (sorry, don't have the references to hand) of osteomyelitis following application of phenol to bone. Thus, in my view, if you are carrying out a partial nail ablation and excision of the granuloma via a fish mouth incision, phenol would be contra-indicated.

    All the best

    Bill Liggins
     
  5. Sammy

    Sammy Active Member

    I would tend to agree with everything Bill has said (written...). I too thought it was a P. Granuloma - still might be even without the underlying exostosis and is probably worth treating as such. Hard to tell without actually seeing it.
    Best wishes.
     
  6. Footsie 100

    Footsie 100 Member

    I feel that you should also consider a melanoma as a differential diagnosis alongside those already mentioned.

    Regards.

    Footsie 100
     
  7. gangrene1

    gangrene1 Active Member

    it does look like pyogenic granuloma to me. If unsure, I suggest you may refer the patient to a dermatologist if necessary. Cheers.
     
  8. Footsie 100

    Footsie 100 Member

    Hi Falconegian,

    I would be interested in an update on your management of the presenting toe problem.

    Thanks.

    Footsie 100
     
Loading...

Share This Page