Hi
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
For those who are unfamiliar, there has been a frustrating and protracted impasse within national Canadian podiatric politics/legislation which pits those with DPM vs non DPM backgrounds in seemingly irreconcilable differences.
This seems to have divided the Canadian podiatric profession since eternity.
Some of the issues might be usefully explored by outsiders and the viewpoint from the US and the UK would be very relevant since the education and institutional differences within Canada might be attributed to the parallel evolution of these distinctly different influences.
Discussion from a previous thread has veered in this direction I am posting it to a wider audience in the hope of attracting opinion outside of Canada and have deliberately not posted within Canada Forum.
Those interested can pick up the issues so far from
http://www.podiatry-arena.com/podiatry-forum/showthread.php?p=189283#post189283
cheers
Martin
<
Podiatric Practice: Organisation and Establishment
|
Ingrown toenails impair lower limb functions
>
<
Podiatric Practice: Organisation and Establishment
|
Ingrown toenails impair lower limb functions
>
Loading...
- Similar Threads - Canadian Podiatric Disunity
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 7,625
-
- Replies:
- 3
- Views:
- 6,246
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 3,680
-
- Replies:
- 1
- Views:
- 3,146
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 14,637
-
- Replies:
- 1
- Views:
- 476
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 415