Comparison off-the-shelf in-shoe heel inserts

NewsBot · Dec 1, 2007

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Off-the-shelf in-shoe heel inserts – Does cost matter?
Arun K Ramanathan, Manakalathil C John, Graham P Arnold, Lynda A Cochrane and Rami J Abboud
Br J Sports Med. Published Online First: 29 November 2007.

Objective: A growing exercise culture has lead to an increase in the use of off-the-shelf heel inserts. While there are a variety of designs in a spectrum of cost ranges, probably the ease of availability and cost would mainly determine the choice of purchase. This study was designed to determine whether expensive designs provide better pressure attenuation under the heel when compared with their less expensive counterparts.

Participants and Design: Six brands of off-the-shelf heel inserts were tested. Selection of these was based purely on their availability in all sizes. Cost per pair ranged from £6 to £30. Thirty-five asymptomatic subjects walked on a 10 metre walkway, once with no inserts and once with each pair of inserts. The Pedar® in-shoe system recorded a range of parameters under the heel. Setting: Institute of Motion Analysis and Research, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee.

Main outcome measures: Evaluation of plantar pressure parameters under the heel.

Results: All inserts reduced peak pressure under the heel. Maximum force and pressure-time integral also decreased. Contact time generally increased with the use of inserts. Values of contact area with and without inserts were comparable.

Conclusions: No significant differences were observed under the heel between the pressure attenuation properties of the lowest priced and the most expensive designs and hence the less expensive inserts can be considered as good as the expensive brands. However, the endurance power of these inserts may differ and this should be evaluated.
Click to expand...

DaVinci · Dec 1, 2007

Aren't they the same people that came out with that research on cheap running shoes being better than expensive?

Admin2 · Dec 1, 2007

DaVinci said: ↑

Aren't they the same people that came out with that research on cheap running shoes being better than expensive?
Click to expand...

Yes:
Cheap running shoes just as effective

Kevin Kirby · Dec 2, 2007

DaVinci said: ↑

Aren't they the same people that came out with that research on cheap running shoes being better than expensive?
Click to expand...

If cost is the only concern of these researchers, why don't they measure cost vs function of small blocks of pillow foam. People are just wasting their money buying any cushioned heel cups when they could make these foam pillow heel cushions for a few cents a pair!!:bash:

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

DaVinci Well-Known Member

Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

Kevin Kirby MVP

The Podiatric Medical Profession: A Gender Comparison

Comparison of Two Forced-Air Warming Device During Foot and Ankle Surgery

Comparison of foot kinematics and the morphology of intrinsic musculature of the foot

Biomechanical effects of continuous loop running in comparison to discontinuous running

Kinematics reduction applied to the comparison of highly-pronated, normal and highly-supinated feet

Comparison of Diabetic Foot Care with Other Diabetic Preventive Care Services

UK POD PROGRAM COMPARISON

Share This Page