< The accuracy of the physical examination for the detection of lower extremity peripheral arterial di | Variability of Centre of Pressure in diabetes >

  1. Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    After my training in advanced wound care several years ago I started to use moist wound healing for the first week, remove the biofilm from the wound in the sulcus then continue with a drier dressing to encourage epithelialisation.

    I seem to have better results, is anyone else doing this? am I completely wrong?
     
  2. mburton Active Member

    I tend to match post nail surgery dressings to level of exudate, but also lifestyle - if the wound is going to become wet every day then a 'cheap and cheerful' non adherent dressing changed every day after bathing works well. In my own experience I wouldn't expect a biofilm to have formed just a week post surgery, although one can certainly form after a few weeks and can easily be 'peeled' away with a scalpel.

    As a general rule all devitalised tissue should be debrided from a wound to optimise conditions for healing.

    best wishes
     
  3. I always think of it as biofilm as when I remove it with forceps it peels away just like biofilm. In some diabetic wound inspite of the antimicrobial used biofilm can be removed in 1 week but that is a chronic wound. Maybe I am removing the devitalised tissue from the phenolisation process.
    Thanks for your response.
     
< The accuracy of the physical examination for the detection of lower extremity peripheral arterial di | Variability of Centre of Pressure in diabetes >
Loading...

Share This Page