facfsfapwca posted on another thread (on duputryns)
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
And
In the words of the great DTT "I can't have that"
Firstly, on the Amfit, Amfit is the system used to derive an EVA device. As a method for capturing the desired morphology it has its advantages and disadvantages, as do they all, but to state that they are not orthosis is, IMO clearly erroneus when one considers the definition of an orthotic!
The statement that they are not as likely correct should surely either be prefaced with "in my experiance" or "the evidence shows" (in which case please produce it!) OR suffixed with an explanation of why you beleive this to be the case!
Secondly on the insoles "made of soft crap". Once again you infer that a certain type on insole will not "correct" somebody adequately. Leaving aside that "correct" is dubious terminology at best in the absence of an established "correct" position to strive to, what rationale do you offer that orthotics made of soft materials cannot exert forces on the foot and therefore alter function?
Kind Regards
Robert
<
Direct Mechanical vs. Neuromotor Effects of Foot Orthoses
|
Research parameters for evaluating casting methods
>
<
Direct Mechanical vs. Neuromotor Effects of Foot Orthoses
|
Research parameters for evaluating casting methods
>
Loading...
- Similar Threads - Types orthotic
-
- Replies:
- 41
- Views:
- 29,857
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 743
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 1,101
-
- Replies:
- 6
- Views:
- 3,551
-
- Replies:
- 5
- Views:
- 3,993
-
- Replies:
- 4
- Views:
- 5,737
-
- Replies:
- 6
- Views:
- 6,876