Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery

NewsBot · May 10, 2019

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery: is there a clinical difference?
K. DaniilidisC. Stukenborg-ColsmanS. EttingerL. ClaassenC. PlaassM. LerchH. WaizyN. MartinelliD.
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY: 04 May 2019

Background
Staple sutures have already been proven as a good alternative to nylon sutures for wound closure in hip and knee surgeries. One such advantage to using staple sutures is the significant decrease in surgical time. In foot surgeries, staple sutures are still considered critical and are only used sporadically.

Objective
The aim of this retrospective study was to compare nylon sutures and skin staples for wound closure in foot and ankle surgeries with respect to complications and patient satisfaction.

Methods
A total of 61 patients underwent different operations in the fore-, mid-, and hindfoot areas, which were performed by a single surgeon. Twenty-nine patients received staple wound closures, while 32 patients received nylon suture closures using the Donati back-and-forth technique. Incision length, surgery time, in-patient stay, and wound complications were recorded. Furthermore, a patient survey using the verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS) for subjective pain and cosmetic results at the time of stitch removal (14 days) and after a 6-week follow-up was conducted.

Results
A significant between-group difference was found for surgery time (p = .041) and VNRS for pain (p < .001), with better results seen for staple sutures. Four patients with staple sutures and five with nylon sutures experienced wound dehiscence 14 days postoperatively. However, all patients had completely healed wounds at their 6-week follow-up. No revisional surgeries were necessary.

Conclusion
The present results indicate that a skin staple wound closure is a considerable alternative to the nylon suture closure in foot and ankle surgeries. Nevertheless, further prospective randomized trials must cement these insights.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Aug 9, 2021

Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Skin Adhesive vs Nylon Sutures for Incision Closure in Forefoot Surgery
Thomas L Lewis et al
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Apr 19

Background: There are many options for incision closure in forefoot surgery. The aim of this study was to compare topical skin adhesive (2-octyl-cyanoacrylate) to simple interrupted nylon sutures.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing topical skin adhesive (TSA) and nylon sutures (NSs) for elective open forefoot surgery. Primary outcome was Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES) assessed 2 weeks following surgery. Secondary objectives included time taken for wound closure, wound assessment, patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis, incision pain, and infection rate.

Results: Between January and December 2018, 84 feet (70 patients) underwent hallux valgus scarf/Akin osteotomy or first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis and were randomized to receive either intervention (topical skin adhesive) or control (3/0 nylon sutures). We found worse HWES scores when using TSA compared to NSs (1.07 vs 0.60). Incision closure time was slower for TSA (mean, 272 vs 229 seconds). At 2 weeks postoperatively, wound care was faster for TSA (mean 71 secs) vs NSs (mean 120), and patient-reported pain was less with TSA (visual analog scale: TSA 1.2 vs NSs 2.1). A high degree of overall patient satisfaction was reported in both groups, without significant difference.

Conclusion: Closure of elective forefoot surgery incisions with topical skin adhesive or interrupted nylon sutures offers high satisfaction rates, low pain scores, and low complications. However, topical skin adhesive was associated with more inflammation and areas of wound separation compared to nylon sutures. We recommend the use of sutures for wound closure in forefoot surgery.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Feb 2, 2022

Foot and Ankle Surgical Incision Closure with Three Different Materials
Daiwei Yao, MD et al
November 28, 2021

There is no clear recommendation for wound closure material in foot and ankle surgery. Thus, we hypothesized that there was no difference in clinical outcomes among three suture materials, namely, absorbable sutures, non-absorbable sutures, and metallic staples. This study compared the three materials for wound closure in foot and ankle surgery. In this prospective randomized study, 124 patients were randomly divided into the non-absorbable suture group, absorbable suture group, and staple group. ASEPSIS score, Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale, and numerical rating scale (regarding pain and satisfaction) were collected at first dressing changes, suture removal, and 6 weeks after surgery. Suture time and incision length were recorded. No significant differences were detected for the ASEPSIS and Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale scores. There was significantly more pain after 6 weeks in the non-absorbable suture group. The closure time (13 s/cm) with staples was significantly lower in the non-absorbable suture group than in the other groups. Regardless of wound closure material, male sex and obesity appeared to be associated with a higher risk for the occurrence of wound complications. The three suture materials showed no significant differences regarding the frequency of wound complications. Staples and absorbable sutures should therefore be considered in the repertoire of suture materials used in foot and ankle surgery.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Apr 5, 2022

Foot and Ankle Surgical Incision Closure With Three Different Materials
Daiwei Yao et al
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Nov 29

There is no clear recommendation for wound closure material in foot and ankle surgery. Thus, we hypothesized that there was no difference in clinical outcomes among 3 suture materials, namely, absorbable sutures, nonabsorbable sutures, and metallic staples. This study compared the 3 materials for wound closure in foot and ankle surgery. In this prospective randomized study, 124 patients were randomly divided into the nonabsorbable suture group, absorbable suture group, and staple group. ASEPSIS score, Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale, and numerical rating scale (regarding pain and satisfaction) were collected at first dressing changes, suture removal, and 6 weeks after surgery. Suture time and incision length were recorded. No significant differences were detected for the ASEPSIS and Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale scores. There was significantly more pain after 6 weeks in the nonabsorbable suture group. The closure time (13 s/cm) with staples was significantly lower in the nonabsorbable suture group than in the other groups. Regardless of wound closure material, male sex and obesity appeared to be associated with a higher risk for the occurrence of wound complications. The 3 suture materials showed no significant differences regarding the frequency of wound complications. Staples and absorbable sutures should therefore be considered in the repertoire of suture materials used in foot and ankle surgery.
Click to expand...

Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Can sutures get wet?

Skin sutures can get wet safely after minor excisions

Share This Page

Nylon sutures versus skin staples in foot and ankle surgery

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Can sutures get wet?

Skin sutures can get wet safely after minor excisions

Share This Page

Useful Searches