Evaluation of foot health related quality of life in individuals with foot problems by gender:

NewsBot · Oct 22, 2018

Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Evaluation of foot health related quality of life in individuals with foot problems by gender: a cross-sectional comparative analysis study.
López-López D et al
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e023980. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023980.

OBJECTIVE:
Foot problems (FP) may be considered to be a prevalent conditions in people but there is limited evidence of their effect on the quality of life (QoL) related to foot health in men and women. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of FPs on both overall foot health and QoL, stratified by gender.

DESIGN:
A cross sectional study.

SETTING:
Clinic of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery at University of A Coruña in the city of Ferrol (Spain).

SUBJECTS:
The sample consisted of 1647 participants with FP; the total population of the sample had a mean age of 43.24±19.89 years, with mean ages 44.09±21.36 years and 42.94±19.34 years for men and women, respectively.

METHODS:
Measurement of sociodemographic characteristics include age, sex and body mass index. The Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) was used to evaluate the general health and foot health. Differences between groups were evaluated by means of a t-test for independent samples.

RESULTS:
Women with FP showed significantly lower scores in the domains of Foot Pain, Foot Function, Footwear, General Foot Health, Physical Activity and Vigour, and there was no difference compared with men in the domains of Overall Health and Social Capacity.

CONCLUSIONS:
Women with FP present a negative impact on QoL related to foot health as compared with men except in the domains of Overall Health and Social Capacity, which appears to be associated with the presence of foot conditions.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Mar 22, 2019

Association between sex differences on foot health related to the quality of life in a sample of sedentary people.
López-López D et al
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Feb;65(2):149-155

Sedentary (sitting) time may produce many anatomical and physiological consequences which are supposedly associated with a decreased quality of life (QoL) related to foot health. Accordingly, this study aimed to analyze the QoL impact on the overall health and the foot health among male and female sedentary people. A total of 312 participants with an age mean of 39.81 ± 15.40 years completed all phases of the study. In addition, self-reported data were registered. The participants' sedentary lifestyle was determined using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) physical activity questionnaire. Furthermore, the scores obtained from the Portuguese version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire were registered. Sedentary people in the equivalent metabolic energy had 301.09 ± 72.22 (min/week). In the first section, values were higher for foot pain and foot function and lower for general foot health and footwear. In the second section, values were higher for general health and vigor and lower for physical activity and social capacity. The differences between the sex groups of the study were statistically significant for footwear (P = 0.008), physical activity (P= 0.002), social capacity (P = 0.001) and vigor (P = 0.001) showing a worst QoL related to foot health in favor of male subjects in comparison with females. The rest of the domains did not show any statistically significant difference (P ≥ .01). The sedentary population evidenced a negative impact on the QoL related to foot health. This problem may be associated with this lifestyle, especially for males.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Mar 9, 2024

Influence of quality of life related to perceived foot health between in a rural an urban population: A case-control research
María Victoria Andreo-García et al
Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14713

Foot problems are very common in the community. Studies indicate that between 18% and 63% of people have foot pain or stiffness and that foot problems have a large impact on people's functional decline and a significant detrimental impact on measures of quality of life related to health. The general objective of this research was to compare foot health in people from the rural population compared to people from the urban population and its relationship with quality of life. A case-control descriptive study was developed with a sample of 304 patients, 152 patients from the rural population and 152 patients from the urban population. Quality of life was measured through the SF-36 Health Questionnaire in its Spanish version. The rural population group had a mean age of 46.67 ± 13.69 and the urban population group 49.02 ± 18.29. Regarding the score of the lowest levels of quality of life related to foot problems, the rural population group compared to the urban population group showed: for body pain (52.21 ± 30.71 vs. 67.80 ± 25.28, p < 0.001); and for mental health (69.58 ± 18.98 vs. 64.60 ± 14.88, p < 0.006). Differences between groups were analysed using Student's t-test for independent samples, which showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). This research offers evidence that the rural population presents better levels of mental health and lower levels of bodily pain in the domains of the SF-36 Health Questionnaire comparing with the urban population.
Click to expand...

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Clinical Biomechanical Evaluation of the foot

Economic Evaluation of Foot Fractures

Reappraising Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Focus on Mechanisms of Ulceration and Clinical Evaluation

The "Balgrist Score" for evaluation of Charcot foot

Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses

Ultrasonography in the evaluation of foot orthotics therapy

Ultrasonography in the evaluation of foot orthotics

Share This Page