Hi
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
I’m currently doing my senior-year clinical rotation and noticed big differences when it comes to diabetic foot-ulcer revision/debridement between the podiatric and orthopaedic profession. We as podiatrist tend to have a more “conservative” approach where we rather debride no more then necessary and have the patient come in for treatment more regularly meanwhile the orthopaedic clinicians have a more aggressive approach where they under LA debride with quite a big margin to the boarder of the ulcer.
Is these differences universal or is it just coincidence that I have made this observations?
I’m also wondering if there is any research made of the outcomes between different approaches?
what do you say about the pros/cons of the different approaches
Hope you all have a nice Sunday
Björn Englund
3:rd year student
Karolinska Institute
Stockholm. Sweden
<
Rocker bottom footwear, wheres the evidence base
|
Outcome measurement tool for diabetic foot ulcerations
>
<
Rocker bottom footwear, wheres the evidence base
|
Outcome measurement tool for diabetic foot ulcerations
>
Loading...
- Similar Threads - Extent depth ulcer
-
- Replies:
- 3
- Views:
- 6,459
-
- Replies:
- 51
- Views:
- 27,471
-
- Replies:
- 1
- Views:
- 3,964
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 7,260
-
- Replies:
- 7
- Views:
- 18,343