From Gerontology
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Footwear Characteristics and Risk of Indoor and Outdoor Falls in Older People
Hylton B. Menz, Meg E. Morris, Stephen R. Lord
Background: Footwear characteristics have been shown to influence balance in older people; however, the relationship between footwear and falls is unclear. Objective: To determine the relationships between footwear characteristics and the risk of indoor and outdoor falls in older people. Methods: Footwear characteristics (shoe type, heel height, heel counter height, heel width, critical tipping angle, method of fixation, heel counter stiffness, sole rigidity and flexion point, tread pattern and sole hardness) were assessed in 176 people (56 men and 120 women) aged 62-96 (mean age 80.1, SD 6.4) residing in a retirement village. Falls were recorded over a 12-month follow-up period and comparisons made between fallers and non-fallers. Results: 50 participants (29%) fell indoors and 36 (21%) fell outdoors. After controlling for age, gender, demographic characteristics, medication use, physiological falls risk factors and foot problems, those who fell indoors were more likely to go barefoot or wear socks inside the home (OR = 13.74; 95% CI 3.88-48.61, p < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in indoor or outdoor footwear characteristics between fallers and non-fallers. Five indoor fallers (10%) and three outdoor fallers (8%) stated that their shoes contributed to their fall. Conclusion: Footwear characteristics were not significantly associated with falls either inside or outside the home. Risk of falling indoors was associated with going barefoot or wearing socks. Older people at risk of falling should therefore be advised to wear shoes indoors where possible.
Other recent footwear and falls papers (PubMed links):
Footwear style and risk of falls in older adults
Biomechanical properties of shoes and risk of falls in older adults
Wearing slippers, falls and injury in residential care
An evaluation of footwear worn at the time of fall-related hip fracture
Tags:
<
Effects of Foot Orthoses on Balance in Older Adults
|
Incorporating foot assessment in the comprehensive geriatric assessment
>
-
Guest
-
Older patient can have shoe related falls due to poor fit secondary to neurologic(diabetes),orthopedic(arthritis) or even economic factors.
-
Guest
John,
Our most recent study found no relationship between footwear fit and falls, however a previous study of footwear and hip fractures found that older people who suffered a trip-related fracture were more likely to be wearing shoes without any method of fixation (ie: laces, buckles, etc). In that study, two participants specifically blamed their shoes for the fall - one stated that her slipper "got stuck", causing her to trip, and another stated that her moccasin slipped off her foot and she tripped over it.
Cheers,
Hylton -
Effects of Footwear Features on Balance and Stepping in Older People.
Menant JC, Steele JR, Menz HB, Munro BJ, Lord SR.
Gerontology. 2008 Feb 4 [Epub ahead of print]
-
In what order were the footwear types tested? These elderly patients may have fatigued towards the end of the testing process. Were the heeled shoes tested last? If so that could have skewed the results a little.
I'm also curious at the wording "An elevated heel of only 4.5 cm height significantly impairs balance in older people". Does this suggest that a 4.5cm heel height is not a significant heel? Does this also mean that anything under 4.5cm is safe?
Trent -
Hopefully Hylton will stop by and confirm this as I do not have the publication handy, but it is pretty standard methodology in these sorts of studies to randomise the order for each subject, so assume that this was what was done.
-
Guest
Hi Trent,
In response to your questions:
1. Yes, the order of testing of the shoes was randomised to account for practice and fatigue effects (see p. 2).
2. The phrase "only 4.5cm" is in reference to previous studies, which have assessed higher heels (5 and 6cm).
There is some evidence that shoes of varying heel heights up to 4cm have no effect on balance (Lindemann et al, 2003) raising the possibility that there may be a critical height above which balance deficits become evident (ie: >4cm).
Ref:
Lindemann U, Scheible S, Sturm E, Eichner B, Ring C, Najafi B, Aminian K, Nikolaus T, Becker C. Elevated heels and adaptation to new shoes in frail elderly women. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Feb;36(1):29-34. abstract -
Hi Hilton,
Men v women?
'children' v 'young adults' v 'middle aged' v 'old' v 'old old'?
Active v inactive?
Those with Hx foot/lower limb injury?
Those classified with 'flat feet' (FPI?)?
Cheers,
Paul -
Hi Hylton,
Thanks for clarifying the randomisation of the tests carried out.
The reason I asked about the heel height was in reference to "critical height" you have mentioned. I'm curious why someone has not collating research in an attempt to standardise acceptable parameters for high heels. It has to be one of the greatest battles out there for Podiatrists. If we could put something out there that says, this is the heel height, width, etc that we have proven correlates to less injuries or even no injuries it would be a great tool to use.
I know you are coming form a different angle, in terms of gerontology, however your research is related. Just a thought.
Trent -
Guest