Ontario Health Regulation
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
Would appreciate some input from Canadian colleagues regarding controlled acts and how they affect the podiatry profession. Specifically under the Chiropody Act, 1991 (Loi de 1991 sur les podologues), reference is made to:
Professional Misconduct
Section (1).4: Delegating or accepting the delegation of a controlled act contrary to the Act or the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts.
and in the main body of the Chiropody Act
Section (2)
In the course of engaging in the practice of chiropody, a member who is a podiatrist is authorized, subject to the terms, conditions and limitations imposed on his or her certificate of registration, to perform the following:
1. Communicating a diagnosis identifying a disease or disorder of the foot as the cause of a person's symptoms.
2. Cutting into subcutaneous tissues of the foot and bony tissues of the forefoot.
3. Administering, by injection into feet, a substance designated in the regulations.
4. Prescribing drugs designated in the regulations. 1991, c. 20, s. 5 (2).
Board
How does the above impact on the foot care nurses who practice entrepreneurially throughout Canada and do they enjoy exemptions in Ontario, and if so, by what means?
I am given to understand similar controlled acts also supplement the New Zealand regulations and I would welcome comment from colleagues there too.
Mark Russell
Tags:
<
OPP Charge Foot Care Practitioners with Fraud
|
Nurses Entrepreneurial Foot Care Association of Canada
>
<
OPP Charge Foot Care Practitioners with Fraud
|
Nurses Entrepreneurial Foot Care Association of Canada
>
Loading...
- Similar Threads - Ontario Zealand Health
-
- Replies:
- 5
- Views:
- 1,414
-
- Replies:
- 16
- Views:
- 53,646
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 15,322
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 13,293
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 14,452
-
- Replies:
- 1
- Views:
- 10,358
-
- Replies:
- 19
- Views:
- 17,882