I'll be honest. I stole this from Simon. He invented an acronym for Formative framework For Not Accepting Rubbish Theories (FFFNART).
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
So I tried to come up with that framework.
So. Each model can be rated out of 5 stars for each element
1. Passion of delivery (how desperately does the author want to be right)
2. Level of over-defensiveness (How nasty do they get when challenged)
3. Persistence (do they quit?)
4. Exuberance of claims (How much do they claim to be able to treat)
5. Inconsistency (Just how much do they contradict themselves)
Average should give a score out of 5 for the Silliness of the model. In this way we should be able to objectively and systematically measure taurine excreta. But I'm open to suggestions on other / better criteria...
Loading...
- Similar Threads - Rate Paradigm (FFFNART)
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 367
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 1,380
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 467
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 602
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 875
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 847
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 1,878