Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

National Primary Health Care Partnership (NPHCP); Another Bureaucracy?

Discussion in 'Australia' started by Cameron, Aug 2, 2008.

Tags:
  1. Cameron

    Cameron Well-Known Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    netizens

    In Australia, the Minister for Health recently launched In Australia, the Minister for Health recently launched The National Primary Health Care Partnership (NPHCP). This is a collaboration of 19 professional organisations representing over 100,000 primary care professionals and consumers and provides an advocacy body and communications platform for the Australian Primary Health Care Factor. More information is posted at http://www.nphcp.com.au

    I cannot help wonder whether this may conflict with the establishment of a national registration body for health professions in the big brown land.

    Am I missing something?

    What say you?

    :confused:toeslayer
     
  2. LuckyLisfranc

    LuckyLisfranc Well-Known Member

    Cameron wrote:

    I dont think this will really have much to do with national registration at all.

    The Partnership is dealing with the funding and delivery of primary care services, and this may or may not include broader Medicare arrangements for podiatry and other non-medical services. As the Federal Health Minister has intimated, there is the possibility that the GP "gatekeeper" stanglehold on the health system is up for consideration also. It is not related to the issue of registration and accreditation of health professions.

    I was reliably informed at a GP conference I presented at recently that 25% of the general practice is due to retire and not be replaced by 2010! This is a recipe for a crisis in primary care, and is why the Feds are on the front foot in trying to develop a strategy to get non-medical professionals to take on a broader role. It would seem it would take a crisis in the GP workforce to "allow" us to practice at a level somewhat closer to our US colleagues, despite all the requests that have been made over the years. That's politics for ya'. :craig:

    These are perhaps very exciting times, however I am a little concerned that there is a non-podiatrist representing the profession at the committee level...:wacko: Hopefully she realises we do a little more that cut toenails and dish out bits of plastic inside shoes.

    LL
     
  3. LuckyLisfranc

    LuckyLisfranc Well-Known Member

    From today's Courier Mail, and out of the "other" reform bureaucracy, the NHHRC.



    LL
     
Loading...

Share This Page