Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Apis OC-2000 Foot Orthotics Carver

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by David Wedemeyer, Nov 28, 2009.

  1. David Wedemeyer

    David Wedemeyer Well-Known Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    I found this ad for the new APIS system and wondered if anyone is familiar with it yet? It appears very turnkey and efficient for an office that dispenses a good number of diabetic insoles (or functional/accommodative devices for that matter and you can mill a positive for a vacuum press).

    http://www.bignwideshoes.com/mt_emey_orthotic_carver.htm

    I'm considering building a small lab in-house so I am interested in any opinion or better options if they exist. I plan on contacting them and finding out which scanners they support both to take the cast and to read the cast (I don't mind plaster casts so much but eliminating them would be advantageous at some point if the quality is there). I spend a small fortune sending my casts out to labs and need to think about the 'next step'.

    Thanks.
     
  2. eddavisdpm

    eddavisdpm Active Member

    David:

    Looks very interesting. I use plaster casting infrequently now. Mainly using the STS fiberglass slipper socks but am considering non-weight-bearing scanning systems such as the Tomcat. See the video: http://www.tom-cat.us/videos/TomCatDr640x480.wmv

    Ed

    Ed Davis, DPM
     
  3. David Wedemeyer

    David Wedemeyer Well-Known Member

    Michael the link is not functioning? Thanks for the interest and I will check your thread.

    Regards,
     
  4. David Wedemeyer

    David Wedemeyer Well-Known Member

    Ed

    I met the owner of STJ on 2008 @ the WPMC in Anaheim. They had a Tomcat on display there, looked good. Interestingly enough they were also interested in the ScanAny system that I had used in the past but nothing ever came of it. I'm leaning towards Sharp Shape as a casting scanner but they're expensive, especially when also looking for a CAD/CAM milling system and presses etc.

    I'm putting it out there as on my Christmas wish list ;)

    David
     
  5. Phil Wells

    Phil Wells Active Member

    David

    Re scanners, I've 'just' seen a new scanner that has 4 cameras aligned at angles to the target rather than perpendicular to it = it see's further up the leg and can capture images as high as the ankle.
    Should be out in the new year and will cost approx £5-6 K.
    Worth waiting for and having a look at.

    Cheers

    Phil
     
Loading...

Share This Page