Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

Monofilament vs. biothesiometer

Discussion in 'Diabetic Foot & Wound Management' started by MBel, May 10, 2012.

  1. MBel

    MBel Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Hi all,

    Commonly during a diabetes foot assessment I have found that people can be sensate to the 5.07 (10g) monofilament but have abnormal vibration sensation, that being >25 volts with the biothesiometer. Achillies reflexes are also commonly absent. From what I remember and recently read large nerve fibre are responsible for vibration sensation but also light touch sensation (i.e. monofilament).

    Could anyone please shed any more light onto this topic and what advice is given to patients with the above neurological result?

    I have been advising patients that they have loss off protective sensation due to abnormal vibration sensation. However, due to being sensate to the monofilament, patients are commonly tested via other health professionals who only use a 5.07 monofilament, are told that their protective sensation is intact!

    Mick B
     
  2. Tuckersm

    Tuckersm Well-Known Member

    Mick,

    Protective sensation has only been shown to be measurable and reproducable with a monofilament. With research showing an actual increased risk of ulceration when the filament is not detected at more than one site. While theoretically sound the Biothesiometer has not undergone quite the same rigour on its actual ability to detect an at risk foot in "the wild"
     
  3. Admin2

    Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

Loading...

Share This Page