Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Everything that you are ever going to want to know about running shoes: Running Shoes Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Have you considered the Critical Thinking and Skeptical Boot Camp, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Podiatrist had sex with patient, sent explicit texts

Discussion in 'Australia' started by NewsBot, Feb 11, 2020.

  1. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1
  2. NewsBot

    NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

    Articles:
    1
    Podiatrist disqualified for transgressing professional boundaries

    18 Sep 2020
    A tribunal has disqualified a podiatrist for six months for transgressing professional boundaries.
    The Podiatry Board of Australia (the Board) referred Mr Phillip Lawson to the Victorian Civil and Administration Tribunal for professional misconduct and unprofessional conduct in relation to his treatment of a client.
    The Board alleged that Mr Lawson engaged:
    • in professional misconduct by transgressing professional boundaries with a client, including by having a sexual relationship with her
    • in professional misconduct by failing to maintain proper and transparent financial commercial dealings by inappropriately billing the Department of Veterans’ Affairs in respect of his treatment of the client
    • in unprofessional conduct by providing podiatry services that were not clinically indicated or justified, and
    • in professional misconduct by failing to maintain accurate or adequate clinical records in respect of his treatment of the client.
    There was agreement between the Board and Mr Lawson that he should be reprimanded. However, they disagreed on whether his conduct warranted disqualification from practise, with the Board submitting that Mr Lawson should be disqualified for two years.
    On 5 February 2020, the tribunal found Mr Lawson guilty of professional misconduct and unprofessional conduct and disqualified him from practising for six months. He was also reprimanded.
    In reaching its determination, the tribunal took into consideration:
    • Mr Lawson’s early admission of the sexual misconduct allegations
    • the he was not currently registered, and had not practised for three years, having surrendered his registration in 2017 when he moved overseas
    • the absence of previous disciplinary history (noting the relatively short time he had practised), and
    • his early undertaking to cease practise.
    The full tribunal summary can be found on the Austlii website.
     
Loading...

Share This Page