I just had a conversation with a colleague in the context of the use of the in-shoe f-scan plantar pressure system in complex cases and reimbursement from third parties such as Workcover and DVA when there is no actual reimbursement code for this.
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
In the cases discussed, there is probably no doubt that a positive outcome in these complex cases was achieved due to this advanced gait analysis altering the foot orthotic prescription in such a way that would it not have happened without the testing.
What do others do for reimbursement in these sorts of cases?
Is an item number needed to cover this? (and yes I do know the pressure to reduce the number of item numbers).
Tags:
<
Neuropads
|
Utilisation of podiatry services in Australia under the Medicare Enhanced Primary Care program, 2004
>
<
Neuropads
|
Utilisation of podiatry services in Australia under the Medicare Enhanced Primary Care program, 2004
>
Loading...
- Similar Threads - Reimbursment advanced gait
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 1,602
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 1,536
-
- Replies:
- 4
- Views:
- 4,350
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 3,830
-
- Replies:
- 2
- Views:
- 5,106
-
- Replies:
- 0
- Views:
- 6,042
-
- Replies:
- 10
- Views:
- 15,498