Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Everything that you are ever going to want to know about running shoes: Running Shoes Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Have you considered the Critical Thinking and Skeptical Boot Camp, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Best foot forward (Cycling article)

Discussion in 'Biomechanics, Sports and Foot orthoses' started by Lance, Jul 30, 2007.

  1. Lance

    Lance Member

    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Found this today:

    Health - Best foot forwardPosted by Nick Morgan

    Foot orthoses, which are normally insoles combined with a small wedge-like piece of material called a 'wedge' or 'post' have been part of the sports medicine armoury for years as a method of combating biomechanical imbalances. Recently though, some scientists have questioned whether certain injuries might not be better tackled through core stability exercises.

    The debate is whether wedges truly address the cause of the problem or whether they simply deal with one of its symptoms. A problem in the foot, after all, can have its origins in a different part of the body entirely.

    "Biomechanically speaking, the foot is merely the end of a series of linkages that make up the human body," says Professor Mark Batt of the Centre for Sports & Exercise Medicine at the University of Nottingham. "So if you have a weakness in, for example, the buttock muscles, it can in turn lead to a problem in the knee which could cause another effect in the foot."

    The case against wedges

    The argument against wedges, then, is that you're better off working on strengthening or correcting your biomechanical 'foundation' - that is your hips, trunk and shoulders - than forking out for wedges. Too often though, the solution isn't necessarily black or white, according to Batt.

    "The principle of using core stability exercises rather than wedges to tackle these kinds of problems is sound," said Batt. "But there will be people, and not necessarily a minority, for whom those exercises will not be sufficient and who will still require orthoses. The key is to get a correct diagnosis - too often othoses are prescribed when they'll do little good." For example, wedges are often prescribed for cyclists to treat front or rearfoot mal-alignments. That is, when one foot is angled inwards or flattened to compensate for a slight difference in leg length. However, according to biomechanics expert Martin Haines, it may not be that the legs are actually of different length, but that they look like they are because of a problem in the alignment of the pelvis.

    "A rotated pelvis is probably the most likely reason for people who have one leg shorter than the other," said Haines. "Certainly anecdotal evidence points to this and in these cases wedges can cause more problems than they solve."

    A rotated pelvis occurs when the pelvic bone becomes locked in an abnormal position. This rotation results in the apparent leg discrepancy, which the cyclist then tries to compensate for by flattening or arching their foot as they push the pedal, resulting in injury.

    In this scenario, Haines argues, wedges may exacerbate the injury as they are likely to perpetuate a leg discrepancy which isn't actually there. Far better, he claims, is to try and correct the pelvic problem through manipulation and exercise.

    As a result, Haines helped form a company called HumanLab, which produces a software package that cyclists can use to monitor their own biomechanical health and prescribes correcting exercises accordingly.

    They tested 4,000 individuals and compared them bio-mechanically with a couple of computer robots. By seeing how the humans differed from the robot gold standard, they were able to discover the most common problems and the exercises required to put them right.

    "There is nothing new about these exercises," said Haines. "They're all established core stability exercises: mostly abdominal and lower-back strengthening work aimed at straightening the alignment of the hips, spine and shoulders. But thousands of people have tried them and have had positive results."

    One of those was former Cycling Plus writer Andy Waterman, an experienced cyclist who was perpetually troubled by hip stiffness, especially after long rides. He found that doing the exercises cleared up his problems in a matter of weeks.

    Furthermore, while Haines' has a vested interest, even those in the orthotics industry concede that cyclists sometimes need to look beyond wedges for their injury solutions.

    "Because cycling is only a semi-weightbearing activity unlike, for example running, and because cyclists only have their fore-foot on the pedal, I think that under these circumstances there is only a limited amount (that wedges) can achieve," said Mark Elmer of Premier Orthotics.

    The case for wedges

    This is not to say, however, that wedges are useless. There are other causes aside from a rotated pelvis for both leg discrepancy and poor foot alignment. It could simply be a genetic issue or as a result of the healing process following a broken leg. In these cases and others, wedges may still be beneficial either as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with the core stability exercises.

    For example, Elmer notes that wedges may be of far more use to cyclists off the bike than on because a person is less weight-bearing on a bike than when simply walking around. Plus if it's a heel problem, that part of the foot is unlikely to be on the pedal so a wedge may be of more use on a day-to-day basis, for walking around, than whilst cycling.

    "There is undoubtedly a large number of people who do benefit and will continue to benefit from orthotics," said Dr Mike Stone of the English Institute of Sport. "But I think it is fair to say that the number is smaller in cycling than other sports and that the majority of those might be solved through specific exercise programmes."

    All the doctors and scientists agreed that the vital first step for any cyclist with a lower-limb injury is to get the problem properly diagnosed. Whether wedges are then part of the correct solution depends on what that diagnosis is, but if the problem is caused by a rotated pelvis, they probably aren't.
  2. Admin2

    Admin2 Administrator Staff Member

  3. Stanley

    Stanley Well-Known Member

    This is exactly why I have been saying for the last 25 years that we as podiatrists need to understand the pelvis. We need to know this, so that we are the first ones the athletes come to see.
  4. CraigT

    CraigT Well-Known Member

    I agree that we should have an understanding of the pelvis... but I think it is also important that other practitioners understand that foot function can affect the pelvis and lower back.
    I do not think it is our role to assess and treat the pelvis though... I would much rather have at my disposal a physio/chiro/osteo who can give an experienced assessment. They will have much better knowledge, skill and 'feel' just as a Podiatrist will with respect to foot assessment.
    Are there any studies out there about influence of the lower limb/ foot on pelvic mechanics??
  5. Stanley

    Stanley Well-Known Member

    Absolutely. If you can explain to a chiroprator how you can help him with a chronic anterior ilium via treating the foot, you will get many referrals. The key here is to balance the pelvis via the foot. :cool:

    I have to disagree with you Craig. :( I don't think we should have to rely on anyone to tell us that foot orthoses are indicated for a pelvic problem and/or if a physio/chiro/osteo is needed to help us treat the foot.

    Chiropractors evaluate the pelvis in the prone position. They cannot see the effect of the foot in this position. A bonus in learning the weight bearing evaluation is that we can see the effect of our work on the pelvis and hence the rest of the body. It is also an excellent means of finding out if a myoptic approach to podiatric biomechanics is helping or hurting the patient. :cool: Once you have done this for a while you will not be able to evaluate a pair of orthoses without evaluating a pelvis.

    I'm sorry, :eek: I only know of one article:
    S Beekman, H Louis, JM Rosich, and N Coppola
    A preliminary study on asymmetrical forces at the foot to ground interphase
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1985 75: 349-354.
    It has a step by step evaluation of the iliosacral joint for the podiatrist, and the accuracy is substantiated by piezo electric crystals under the heel. If you look at the age of the article and the scope of what podiatry is, and look at the advances in scope that the other areas of podiatric medicine have made in that time (ie. in podiatric surgery, we have gone from the bunion to external fixation for ankle fractures), you will understand the disappointment that I have with our profession in the area of podiatric biomechanics. :( Since this article is over 20 years old, some things have been eliminated (ie the muscle energy technique for distraction of the Iliosacral joint), and some things have advanced a few levels (ie the use of orthoses for anterior innominate secondary to pronation is replaced by evaluation of the cuneiform joints).



Share This Page