Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Nail Surgery reimbursement in Australia

Discussion in 'Australia' started by TeaBelly, Dec 17, 2009.

Tags:
  1. TeaBelly

    TeaBelly Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    Hi All

    As a podiatrist who is new to the Australian healthcare system, can someone please explain why GPs are able to claim from Medicare for performing nail surgery but podiatrists can't.

    Thanks

    TB
     
  2. DaVinci

    DaVinci Well-Known Member

  3. LuckyLisfranc

    LuckyLisfranc Well-Known Member

    It could all be changed with the stroke of a pen if the political will was there.

    They would just need to put a little asterix against the item number/s for nail surgery (and any other relevant service you care to suggest) that podiatrists and their patients could be rebated on, IN ADDITION to medical practitioners.

    In my opinion the MBS is one of the most anti-competitive pieces of bureaucracy that the government administers.

    Write to your local federal MP and point this out.

    Patient A = gets procedure by GP and gets a rebate
    Patient B = gets procedure by Podiatrist and pays full amount

    Argue that Podiatrist is explicitly trained in the care of foot problems, as compared to a GP who would have little formal education in this anatomical region. And just how does this benefit the health of Australians?

    Meanwhile the GP also gets 'incentives' to allow the patient to claim electronically, and all manner of other little bits of cash.

    Political lobbying is the only way it will ever change.

    LL
     
Loading...

Share This Page