What do you think?
Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
http://www.springboost.com/en/
http://www.springboost.com/en/dorsiflexion/dorsiflexion_biomechanics.html
Tags:
-
-
This "Springboost" shoe range does look interesting. This apparent "DORSI Technology"; not to be confused with Earth's - "Negative Heel Technology" (a lot of technology going round :rolleyes:) seems to work off the concept of heel striking (as seen here)... from what I can make out.
It doesn't appear that "Springboost" is marketing a running shoe (???).
Anyway, so we have the traditional training shoe with its 12mm heel-forefoot differential (HHD) - hence the foot functioning in a relative plantarflexed position. We have now the "Springboost" range with a negative heel - now with "Dorsiflexion Technology" via the following concept...
Then we have my position of a plantigrade/zero drop/flat running shoe (although I don't claim this idea as my own ;)) - come to think about it, maybe I could develop a shoe with... "Plantigrade Technology" :rolleyes:. Being apparently the middle of the road I could be quite successful with it (along with my profound logic behind the "technology").
Just thinking about it, one has to wonder how these above concepts affects the STJ role/function - just to name one varying aspect between these diverse concepts. Does anybody else wonder how/why we can be in a position where there is apparent support for the benefits of such a range i.e. elevated HHD to negative HHD. Is there an optimal answer here or are we to confuse the Central Nervous System on a continual basis.
One could be excused for asking an apparent naughty question - which is more... "NATURAL" :eek:... heel elevated, forefoot elevated... or maybe placed in a position not conflicting with the primordial anatomical design. Anyway, who am I (& for that matter, anybody else... except maybe the Designer of the lower limb) to say what is "natural" in this area. Being "natural" is a rather airy fairy ambiguous term, maybe we should be asking/researching what is more biomechanically efficient for the intended activity or the intended objectives. Or maybe we should just allow the physiology of the foot/lower limb to do the talking here... just accommodate for its protection whilst eliminating the potential for (adverse) influence - just a thought.
Anyhow, all very interesting & something to think about... & further confuse the general public as to what they should be wearing on their feet :empathy:.
-
Achilles tenon injury, here they come.
Regarding heel elevated, forefoot elevated, natural etc. A three word question: variation in terrain?
Say we have a shoe which due to the heel height differential plantarflexes the foot by 5 degrees and then we walk / run up a 5 degree incline? etc. -
This I feel is yet another reason for flat/zero HHD to be now seriously considered across the board. Fat chance I know for women’s fashion shoes - but hey, what can you do... :butcher: the heels?.
Loading...
- Similar Threads - 'Dorsi Technology' Running
-
- Replies:
- 5
- Views:
- 8,715