Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures

NewsBot · Mar 14, 2023

Conservative versus Surgical Management of Fifth Metatarsal Diaphyseal Fractures: A Retrospective Review
Marc D Jones et al
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2023 Jan-Feb;113(1):20-195

Background: Historically, distal fifth metatarsal diaphyseal fractures have been treated with conservative management, with only limited research evaluating surgical treatment of these fractures. This study was performed to compare surgical versus conservative treatment of distal fifth metatarsal diaphyseal fractures in athletes and nonathletes.

Methods: A retrospective review of 53 patients with surgical or conservative treatment of isolated fifth metatarsal diaphyseal fractures was performed. Data recorded included age, sex, tobacco use, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, time to clinical union, time to radiographic union, athletic versus nonathletic status, time to return to full activity, surgical fixation method, and complications.

Results: Patients treated surgically had a mean clinical union time of 8.2 weeks, radiographic union time of 13.5 weeks, and return to activity time of 12.9 weeks. Patients treated conservatively had a mean clinical union time of 16.3 weeks, radiographic union time of 25.2 weeks, and return to activity time of 20.7 weeks. Delayed unions and nonunions occurred in 27.0% of patients (10 of 37) treated conservatively and in none in the surgical group.

Conclusions: Surgical treatment significantly decreased time to radiographic union, clinical union, and return to activity by an average of 8 weeks compared with conservative treatment. We suggest that surgical treatment of distal fifth metatarsal fractures is a viable option that may significantly decrease the patient's time to clinical union, radiographic union, and return to activity.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · May 22, 2023

Short-Term Outcomes of Jones Specific Implant vs. Intramedullary Screw and Plate Fixation for Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures
Aman Chopra, BA et al
May 19, 2023

Although intramedullary screw fixation is commonly performed for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures, high rates of nonunion, refracture, and hardware prominence have been reported. The Jones Specific Implant (JSI) is a novel surgical implant which contours to the native curvature of the fifth metatarsal allowing for a more anatomic fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term complication rates and outcomes of patients treated with the JSI to other fixation types such as plates and intramedullary screws. Electronic records were queried for adult patients with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures who underwent primary fixation from 2010 - 2021. All patients were treated by a foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeon with intramedullary screws, plates, or JSI (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL). Visual analog scale (VAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) were recorded and compared using univariate statistics. Eighty-five patients underwent fixation using intramedullary screw (n=51, 60%), plate (n=22, 25.9%), or JSI (n=12, 14.1%) with a mean follow-up of 11.1±14.6 months. The total cohort demonstrated a significant improvement in VAS pain (p < 0.0001) as well as AOFAS (p < 0.0001) scores. When comparing the cohort treated with JSI and the cohort treated with all other types of fixation, there were no significant differences in postoperative VAS or AOFAS scores. Only three complications, one with JSI, (3.5%) required removal of the symptomatic hardware. The JSI is a novel treatment for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures, with similar early outcomes and complication rates when compared with intramedullary screw and plate fixation.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Jun 6, 2023

Anatomic variants affecting the surgical treatment of Jones fractures: A report of 3 cases
Amber M. Kavanagh, DPM, AACFAS, Brian J. Burgess, DPM, FACFAS
May 31, 2023

A Jones fracture is classified as a break that occurs at the proximal diaphyseal and metaphyseal junction of the fifth metatarsal. Higher rates of nonunion are reported with nonsurgical management of this fracture, therefore surgical intervention is recommended. In this case series, we present several unique patients who sustained a Jones fracture, but had bony ossicles or deformity that were complicating factors to surgical treatment. On radiographic evaluation, these bony abnormalities included an os vesalianum, a hypertrophic peroneal tubercle, and severe metatarsus adductus. All of the patients underwent surgical intervention with intramedullary screw placement for fixation across the fracture. Surgical planning to avoid these bony ossicles and adapt to deformities was successful in all cases. We present these three cases to illustrate surgical tips on how to successfully manage Jones fractures when bony abnormalities are present.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Jun 13, 2023

Short term clinical and patient reported outcomes following Virtual Fracture Clinic management of fifth metatarsal fractures
Richard Galloway et al
Injury. 2023 Jun 4

Introduction: Fracture clinics are experiencing increased referrals and decreased capacity. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) are an efficient, safe, and cost-effective solution for specified injury presentations. There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of a VFC model in the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in VFC. We hypothesise that it is both safe and cost effectiveness.

Methods: Patients presenting to VFC at our major trauma centre with a 5th metatarsal base fracture, between January 2019 and December 2019, were included. Patient demographics, clinic appointments, complication and operative rates were analysed. Patients received standardised VFC treatment; walker boot/full weight bearing, rehabilitation information and instructions to contact VFC if symptoms of pain persist after 4 months. Minimum follow-up was one year; Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaires (MOXFQ) were distributed. A basic cost analysis was performed.

Results: 126 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 41.6 years (18-92). Average time from ED attendance to VFC review was 2 days (1 - 5). Fractures were classified according to the Lawrence and Botte Classification with 104 (82%) zone 1 fractures, 15 (12%) zone 2 fractures and 7 (6%) zone 3 fractures. At VFC, 125/126 were discharged. 12 patients (9.5%) arranged further follow-up after initial discharge; pain the reason in all cases. There was 1 non-union during the study period. Average MOXFQ score post 1 year was 0.4/64, with only 11 patients scoring more than 0. In total, 248 face-to-face clinic visits were saved.

Conclusion: Our experience demonstrates that the management of 5th metatarsal base fractures in the VFC setting, with a well-defined protocol, can prove safe, efficient, cost effective and yield good short term clinical outcomes.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Nov 21, 2023

Compression screw internal fixation versus non-weight-bearing cast immobilization for Jones fractures in children
Yuwei Wen et al
Injury. 2023 Nov 14;55(2):111213

Background: Several methods have been used to treat pediatric Jones fractures, but there has been no consensus about the optimum method. The purposes of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes between compression screw and non-weight-bearing techniques used in pediatric Jones fractures and clarify the most suitable treatment option for this population.

Methods: Twenty-one patients who presented with Jones fractures between January 2015 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into the compression screw group (n=10) and cast immobilization (n=11) group. The following parameters were compared between them: demographic data; times to radiographic union, full weight bearing, and return to daily life; and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot scores at 3 months postoperatively and the final follow-up.

Results: The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, laterality, and preoperative displacement. The mean immobilization time and times to radiographic union, full weight bearing, and return to daily life were significantly shorter in the compression screw group than in the cast immobilization group. The AOFAS scores at the final follow-up did not differ significantly between the two groups. One case of refracture and delayed union each were observed in the non-weight-bearing cast group. However, no patients experienced nonunion.

Conclusions: Compression screw and non-weight-bearing cast techniques are effective methods for treating pediatric Jones fractures. The complication rate was lower in pediatrics than in adults. However, compared with the non-weight-bearing cast technique, the compression screw technique has the advantages of a shorter radiographic union time, shorter immobilization times, and earlier return to full weight bearing and daily life. We recommend compression screw fixation for widely displaced fractures and school-age and active adolescents to avoid delays in healing, nonunion, disruption to daily living, and time off school.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Dec 11, 2023

New Classification for Pediatric Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures
Hannah A. Lee, BA et al
December 03, 2023

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures are the most common foot fractures in children. Attempts to classify these injuries are misapplied and inadequately predict outcomes. This is the first study to identify factors associated with healing in pediatric fifth metatarsal fractures. In this retrospective cohort study (N=305), proximal fifth metatarsal fractures were classified on radiographs by location on the bone, alignment (transverse or oblique), displacement (>2mm), and completion through the bone. Based on literature, they were secondarily sorted by category: apophyseal, intra-articular metaphyseal, extra-articular metaphyseal, and diaphyseal. Primary outcomes included times to healing, indicated by clinical symptoms, immobilization, and return to sports, as well as radiographic callus formation, bridging, and remodeling. Healing times were compared by ANOVA and linear regression. Location had a significant effect on times of immobilization and to return to sports, but alignment, displacement, and completion were not associated with healing. When re-classified, the categories were also associated with immobilization and return to sports. Apophyseal fractures healed fastest and diaphyseal fractures required the most time to heal. There was no difference between extra- and intra-articular fractures. For every year of age, symptoms resolved about 2 days sooner. Neither gender nor body mass index (BMI) were positively or negatively associated with healing times. In conclusion, classifying fractures by apophyseal, metaphyseal, and diaphyseal is the most concise, accurate, and useful system. This is the largest series of non-operatively treated proximal fifth metatarsal fractures in children and a robust standard to which surgical management can be compared.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Jan 8, 2024

Jones Fracture in the National Football League
Emily J. Luo et al
Sports 2024, 12(1), 7

Background: Jones fracture, or proximal fifth metatarsal fracture, is a common injury in National Football League (NFL)-caliber athletes. Combine draft performance can greatly impact the long-term success of these athletes, and substantial emphasis has been placed on early return to play (RTP) and the minimization of post-operative complications after Jones fracture in these athletes. To date, no study has specifically described the treatment and outcomes of this injury specifically in NFL-caliber players, considering factors relevant to this unique population. Thus, the purpose of this review is to delve into Jones fracture in NFL-caliber athletes, evaluating the diagnostic, treatment, and RTP considerations. Methods: We searched Medline (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), and SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) for the concept of Jones fractures in the NFL. Using the PRISMA guidelines, a team of three reviewers conducted abstract screenings, full-text screenings, and the extraction of studies describing Jones fractures specifically in the NFL. Results: Of the 1911 studies identified, 6 primary retrospective studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The heterogeneity of the outcome reporting precluded a meta-analysis; thus, a qualitative review of manuscripts describing Jones fracture was carried out. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment considerations, RTP statistics and outcomes, and complications were discussed. Amongst the primary studies, there were 285 Jones fractures, all athletes were able to RTP, and the average time to RTP ranged from 6 weeks to 27 weeks. For complications, with operative treatment, the refracture rate ranged from 4 to 12%, and incomplete healing ranged from 7 to 50%. RTP was 15 weeks for refractures. There were no patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: The vast majority of Zone 2/3 Jones fractures are treated with IM screw fixation with or without adjunctive orthobiologics, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate, in NFL-caliber athletes. The six major series investigating outcomes after the operative treatment of Jones fractures in NFL players reveal very positive findings overall with regard to RTP, reoperation, and career continuation.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Apr 3, 2024

Is Surgical Treatment Necessary for the Treatment of a Jones Fracture?: A Retrospective Study
Changsu Kim et al
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(2):335-341

Background: Jones fractures are common injuries that can be treated conservatively or surgically. However, the optimal treatment approach remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of conservative and operative treatments for Jones fractures and determine whether surgical treatment is necessary.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 69 patients with Jones fractures treated at our hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups: conservative (C group; n = 46) and operative (O group; n = 23) treatments. Patients were followed up after 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and every 3 months thereafter. However, outpatient follow-ups were conducted between 8 and 10 weeks as needed. The mean follow-up period was 14.5 weeks (range, 12-24 weeks). In group C, the patients were treated with a non-weight-bearing cast for 4-6 weeks, followed by additional weight-bearing boot immobilization before returning to exercise. In group O, patients were treated surgically using a bicortical screw or intramedullary internal fixation. Time to radiologic union, clinical union, return to sports, visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index-Revised Short Form (FFI-RS), and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were evaluated.

Results: Sixty-nine patients were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences in the time to radiologic union and return to sports, VAS score in the second week, and FFI-RS score in the 12th week. In group C, favorable outcomes were observed in terms of the time to return to sports, VAS score in the second week, and FFI-RS score in the 12th week. Contrastingly, in group O, better results were observed in time to radiologic union. The AOFAS score was excellent at the final follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Complication rates were 10.8% and 13% in groups C and O, respectively.

Conclusions: Surgical treatment is sometimes necessary for Jones fractures, but conservative treatment should also be considered because of the favorable outcomes. Conservative treatment can be a good option for patients who are risk-averse and place a high value on fracture healing without surgery.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Apr 4, 2024

Functional outcome and risk of non-union for 5th metatarsal base fractures
Ethan Toner et al
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr 3

Objectives: Treatment of 5th metatarsal fractures via direct discharge from virtual fracture clinic (VFC) has become common practice in the NHS. We aim to assess the functional outcome and incidence of non-union in a series of 5th metatarsal base fractures, exposed to 1-year of follow-up.

Methods: 194 patients who sustained a fracture between the period February 2019 to April 2020 were included, referred via the VFC pathway. Radiographs were reviewed to classify in which zone, the fracture occurred along with union on subsequent follow-up. Telephone follow-up was used to measure patient functional outcomes (EQ-5D & FAAM survey) and satisfaction with the VFC service.

Results: Off 194 patients, 53 (27.3%) had zone 1, 99 (51%) had zone 2, and 42 (21.6%) had zone 3 fractures. 80 were discharged directly from VFC, with 114 patients being offered at least one face to face clinic follow-up. Six (3.1%) patients had clinical and radiological evidence of non-union; 4 in zone 2, and 2 in zone 3. No zone 1 injuries were identified as a non-union. Only 2 patients had surgery, 1 of which was for symptomatic non-union. Of the 6 non-union patients, 1 had surgery, 4 did not wish to have surgery and the final non-union patient was deemed unsuitable for surgery.

Conclusion: The VFC is an effective way of managing 5th metatarsal fractures, with high patient satisfaction. Conservative management has excellent outcomes, with a low percentage of zone 2 and 3 injuries developing a symptomatic non-union. Functional outcome surveys provide further reassurance.
Click to expand...

NewsBot · Apr 22, 2024 at 2:27 AM

Effectiveness of transverse double "8"-shaped tension band technique for Lawrence zone Ⅰ fracture of the fifth metatarsal base
Hongtao Jiang et al
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 15;38(4):444-447

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of transverse double "8"-shaped tension band technique in the treatment of Lawrence zoneⅠfracture of the 5th metatarsal base.

Methods: Between February 2019 and October 2021, 15 patients with Lawrence zoneⅠfracture of the 5th metatarsal base were treated with transverse double "8"-shaped tension band technique. There were 8 males and 7 females, with a median age of 40 years (range, 23-59 years). The fractures were caused by sprains. The time from injury to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.1 days). X-ray films were taken to observe the fracture healing and the anchor looseness and detachment. The foot function was evaluated by American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the eversion angle of the calcaneal talus joint.

Results: The incisions healed by first intention after operation in 14 cases and the incision healed poorly in 1 case. All patients were followed up 8-12 months (median, 10 months). The imaging examination showed that all fractures healed well, with a healing time of 10-14 weeks (mean, 11.7 weeks). At last follow-up, AOFAS score was 82-100 (median, 98); 13 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. VAS score was 0-3 (median, 1). Three cases had mild limited ankle joint range of motion, while 12 cases had normal range of motion. The eversion angle of the calcaneal talus joint was 25°-32° (median, 30°).

Conclusion: The application of transverse double "8"-shaped tension band technique for Lawrence zone Ⅰ fracture of the 5th metatarsal base has advantages such as simple operation, avoidance of secondary operation, and reduction of foreign body sensation, with definite effectiveness.
Click to expand...

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Transverse fracture proximal to the fifth metatarsal

'MoAkin' biplanar proximal phalanx closing wedge osteotomy

Proximal influences on plantar pressures

Extensor Digitorum Longus Tendon Insertion in the Proximal Nail Matrix

Proximal Plantar Intrinsic Tendinopathy

Proximal tibial bone graft

Does ‘proximal control’ need a new definition or a paradigm shift in exercise prescription?

Share This Page

Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

NewsBot The Admin that posts the news.

Transverse fracture proximal to the fifth metatarsal

'MoAkin' biplanar proximal phalanx closing wedge osteotomy

Proximal influences on plantar pressures

Extensor Digitorum Longus Tendon Insertion in the Proximal Nail Matrix

Proximal Plantar Intrinsic Tendinopathy

Proximal tibial bone graft

Does ‘proximal control’ need a new definition or a paradigm shift in exercise prescription?

Share This Page

Useful Searches